Logic & Debate Training in GL–Shedra II, and the Healing of a Lifelong Fear
In GL–Shedra II, students enter the heart of Tibetan scholastic training: Pramāṇa, the science of reasoning.
The Khenpo often tells them:
“Debate is not a battle. It is the art of seeing your own mind clearly.”
This approach comes directly from places like Larung Gar, where thousands of monks and nuns debate daily, and from Geluk monastic universities, where logic is considered the primary tool for sharpening wisdom.
At Giao Long, the discipline is introduced gently. Before students ever raise their voices in a courtyard debate, they learn the foundations: valid cognition, inference, syllogisms, and fault-analysis.
But the true purpose of debate isn’t intellectual skill — it is inner honesty.

To understand the power of logical training, consider the well-documented case of a young monk at Sera Monastery (shared by Geshe Tsondue in public interviews).
As a child, he had grown up in a household where arguing meant danger: raised voices led to violence.
When he entered monastic education, debate terrified him. Every clap of the hands — the signature gesture of Tibetan disputation — felt like a threat.
One day, during debate practice, his teacher stopped the entire courtyard and said to him:
“You think he is attacking you. But he is attacking your confusion. Let him.”
That moment became a turning point.
The monk later described that realization as the first time in his life he understood the difference between a challenge to his ego and a threat to his safety.
Through years of training, debate didn’t just make him a scholar — it healed something much deeper.
He said in an interview:
“Logic taught me that my fear was not truth. It was only a thought that I had believed for too long.”
At Giao Long Monastery, students learn debate not as a performance but as a contemplative practice:
Debate circles are small, guided by Tibetan Geshe and Khenpo who emphasize kindness before correctness.
Students learn to formulate precise arguments, identify logical fallacies, and analyse philosophical positions with sharp clarity.
But more importantly — they learn to stay present when discomfort arises.
For many learners, this becomes the first time they realise:
✔ they can disagree with someone
✔ without losing connection,
✔ without losing dignity,
✔ without losing themselves.
At its best, Tibetan debate dismantles the illusion that “my thoughts define me.”
When a student’s cherished view is challenged, they may feel attacked — until they realise the view is not the self.
This shift changes everything:
✔ arguments become opportunities
✔ discomfort becomes insight
✔ mistakes become openings
✔ logic becomes compassion
Students often report something surprising:
the skills they gain in debate help them communicate better with family, navigate conflict in daily life, and relate to others with more patience and courage.
They don’t just become better thinkers.
They become freer people.
From an academic standpoint, debate training is central to Tibetan Buddhist education because it operationalizes the principles of epistemology (pramāṇa) and philosophical analysis (rigs pa).
It fosters cognitive clarity, intellectual humility, and the ability to discriminate valid reasoning from fallacy.
As demonstrated in the monastic universities of Tibet and India, debate is not merely a pedagogical method —
it is a contemplative technology for transforming how one perceives the world.
In GL–Shedra II, students engage with debate both intellectually and experientially, replicating the classical training of Larung Gar and CIHTS while adapting it to a modern learning environment.
Thus, the teaching becomes not only a tool for scholarship, but a path for psychological healing and inner freedom — a defining pillar of the undergraduate program at Giao Long Monastery.
GIAO LONG MONASTERY
GIAO LONG MONASTERY
GIAO LONG MONASTERY
GIAO LONG MONASTERY